Detail: Adequate but not excessive detail is provided in relation to reporting, recording, confidentiality and the appeals process. The policy incorporates simple flow charts to demonstrate how the policy is enacted in practice. (AISP 2010-2012).
Data from presentations of all five institutions with exemplary academic integrity policy at the EAIP Roundtable (28 February 2013) were coded under the theme ‘tools for decision-making’, with presenters agreeing on the importance of providing academic integrity breach decision-makers and other stakeholders with a simple flowchart that details specific roles and tasks.
Examples : The University of Melbourne has a flowchart showing the process for an allegation of misconduct. See also Griffith University (Sections 6-10).