Topic outline
-
- Introduction
- The research story line
- Thesis and exegesis styles
- Thesis and exegesis chapter structure examples
- Descriptive style, topic based structure, document analysis, criminology
- Informative style, traditional simple structure, grounded theory, nursing midwifery
- Descriptive style, topic based structure, Foucaultian document analysis, Australian studies
- Informative style, traditional simple structure, computer modelling, business, economics
- Informative style, traditional simple structure, statistical analysis, economics and commerce
- Informative style, traditional complex/compilation of journal articles, survey, experimental, psychology
- Informative style, traditional simple structure, in-depth interviews, masculinity studies
- Journal article structure examples
- References
Introduction
Notwithstanding the diversity among theses, exegeses and journal articles, all academic writing aims to persuade the reader of an idea, or to report a key finding. This central claim or finding is sometimes referred to as the ‘thesis’, and it is the ‘significant original contribution to knowledge, and/or to the application of knowledge within the field of study’ that is referred to in research degree guidelines and regulations.
This resource will introduce two written styles in theses, exegeses and journal articles, and the different structures used to frame the research story line of the thesis. Although there are differences in the chapter breakdown, and the proportion of overall content dedicated to each step within the thesis structure, all research writing has the same steps, very typically in the order shown below:
- Step 1: problem statement
- Step 2: review of literature
- Step 3: method/methodology
- Step 4: results/evidence/discussion of creative work
- Step 5: discussion and/or conclusion
These steps carry the thread within large and complex academic research texts. Steps two, three, four and five are discussed in detail in the following topics within this resource. The topic that follows this one, on introduction writing, and the topic on writing abstracts, shows how the key information from each of the steps in the story line is extracted or condensed to introduce the research in brief.
This topic focuses on the whole of thesis or journal article/chapter level, attending to overall structure and style in a variety of different theses and journal article types. The objective of this topic is to highlight the crafted nature of the research narrative, and to show how a common research story line manifests in different thesis styles and structures.
The research story line
Although researchers often work alone on their research, research is fundamentally a collective activity. The knowledge, practices and values of the collective are embodied within published papers within organised fields of inquiry, and they come to life when researchers from all over the globe meet to discuss their research in international conferences. Research questions are framed within discipline literature to communicate to specific discipline audiences, and data and conclusions are read in relation to the findings and conclusions of researchers in a field. Data is read to highlight what was new or 'significant' to the research audience. In short, a thesis or an exegesis is not simply a record of the outcome of an investigation, but a tailored story written for a specific audience.
Consider the different meanings of the terms 'report' and 'story' in thinking about crafting your 'thesis'. According to the dictionary 'to report' means to provide an account of a matter after a thorough investigation. 'Story', on the other hand, means, not simply to 'report facts pertinent to a question', but to craft or create a narrative that interests or engages the reader, and to construct a plot line.
There are implicit conventions that underpin research writing in the international or English speaking research context; often unspoken expectations around how to tell a research story. There are also important differences among disciplines in research writing conventions and practices, as well as many similarities. And what is considered appropriate changes over time as researchers in a discipline collectively take up new writing practices, or drop old ones. The important thing to understand is that research writing, as a generalised, and as a discipline-specific practice, has associated patterns, steps or narrative styles that researchers have developed to fit the unique purpose or practice of communicating their research to one another.
The steps in the story line and how they fit together is the focus of this topic which is designed to highlight some of the differences and commonalities in research writing across disciplines within the social sciences and humanities. For the sake of simplicity, and at the risk of over simplification, the 'steps' in the story line might be characterised as follows:
- There's a problem!
- Although we (discipline academics) know a lot about this problem, there are aspects that warrant further reflection (literature 'gap').
- I'm going to investigate/explore further by collecting information and reflecting (methods/methodology).
- I came up with some interesting conclusions (results/explication of argument/creative practice).
- We can now refine our understanding (discussion/conclusion).
Although the overall story does not usually come together until the later stages of drafting, crafting the story line happens throughout the drafting process. The final shape of the story is the result of considerable intellectual labour and creativity on the part of the author, comprised of many small decisions and revisions across the research and writing journey.
Thesis and exegesis styles
Metcalf (2002:6-7) has identified two thesis 'styles' used in thesis narratives, what he calls 'hypothesis testing', also known as the 'informative' style, and the 'descriptive' or 'argument' style. The key difference between the two styles is not in the order of the steps in the story line, but in whether or not they tell the reader their conclusions in the introduction of the thesis or exegesis, or not. Your discipline may use one or both of these styles. It can be helpful to be clear about the style you are aiming for in the writing process.
Informative style
‘The cops discover who did it’ (Metcalfe, 2002:6-7).
The informative style of writing asks a question in the introduction, usually in the form of a statement of the aim or objective, following the outline of the problem and the gap in the literature. The thesis then tells a story about how the question or aim was investigated or achieved (methodology), and presents the evidence that was collected to reach the conclusion (results). The conclusion or answer to the question is not presented until the end of the thesis, although it does appear in the abstract. Metcalf refers to this story telling sequence as 'the cops discover who did it' because the thesis does not provide the answer to the question, or wrap up what was found in relation to the research aim or objective (and say 'who did it'), until after the investigation is planned and executed. In this kind of thesis the 'clues to the crime' (or results) are revealed gradually in the middle part of the thesis. A final conclusion or wrap-up of all the evidence or results is not provided until the end of the thesis; just as, in a police investigation, the answer to the question at the centre of a crime is not revealed until the end of the investigation.
The implicit line of thought or rationale underpinning the informative style of writing is helpfully articulated in the short handout entitled 'The story of a research study'.
‘Descriptive’ or argument style
‘The lawyers convince a jury’ (Metcalfe, 2002:6-7).
The descriptive style thesis or exegesis does not pose a question in the introduction, but instead provides a statement of the main proposition or 'argument' of the thesis. This is also presented in the abstract. This statement of the argument typically appears in the same place that an objective or aim statement would within the introduction of the informative style thesis; that is, after the problem outline and the summary of the 'gap' in literature. Each chapter after any literature review and methodology chapters then works to support the main proposition by providing further explication or specific substantiation (reasoned debate, evidence, presentation of data, reflective commentary on creative practice). Metcalf refers to this style as 'the lawyers convince a jury' because the case or conclusion ('who did it') is provided in the introduction and abstract. The thesis then goes about persuading the reader that the case is a good one, just as a lawyer will tell the court what they will argue in their opening remarks to the court, and then go about providing evidence to support their case.
The rationale underpinning the construction of 'argument' in the descriptive style is helpfully discussed in the Vitae training resource entitled 'argument construction'.
The informative style is traditionally more typical in social science and science disciplines, particularly when research is based on the collection of empirical data. The descriptive style is more common in humanities disciplines, particularly those based on inter-textual work or creative artefacts. Having said this, discipline writing styles change over time, and disciplines have their own unique conventions. These styles are presented here to give new research writers an insight into the implicit expectations research readers have when they read research and scholarship. There is no 'correct' research writing style, but it is important to observe and become familiar with conventions in your discipline area.
Similarities and differences between the informative and descriptive styles
The commonalities in informative and descriptive styles revolve around their shared use of the steps within the research story line. Both styles typically open by outlining a problem or by providing a justification for the research, most often in terms of its real world contemporary significance. Both also situate their inquiry within a review of literature, and then move on to outline what was done to undertake the inquiry, followed by the presentation of empirical evidence or reasoned debate or discussion of a creative work in the main body to establish or support conclusions. Both styles also discuss the implications arising from the research conclusions in the final chapter.
Some differences in the informative and descriptive styles are outlined below.
Abstracts
One of the key differences between the styles is in the way abstracts are written, particularly for journal articles. An outline of different abstract types can be found in the Abstract writing topic on this site.
Methodology
Other differences in the two styles emerge from their association with different methods or methodologies. Informative research writing typically has longer methods sections and commonly uses headings like 'sample', 'materials', 'data analysis', and so on. Descriptive research writing may or may not have a separate methodology section. In some disciplines, and especially in published journal articles, no distinguishable detail about method, and no separate methodology section, may be provided (this is sometimes, but not always the case in law for instance). Detail about method may be omitted because there is consensus about a given approach within the discipline. That is to say, since everyone in the discipline uses and understands the approach it is assumed that there is no need, and little space in a journal article, to provide detail about it. Detail about the approach taken to reach conclusions is usually conveyed within the discussion in the main body. This is however the exception to the rule. In the vast majority of research writing, certainly in research proposals, and for most theses and exegeses, methodology is discussed in detail, and this usually occurs in the part of the thesis immediately following the review of literature.
Conclusions and discussions
Another difference between the informative and descriptive styles is in the way concluding chapters are written. In informative theses, there is typically a discussion section or chapter, or, if not, conclusion chapters may be a little longer because more space is needed to lay out and discuss conclusions which have not been presented earlier. In the descriptive thesis or journal article, there may not be a 'discussion' section, and conclusions can be fairly short containing just a restatement of the argument and a summary of how it was supported, followed by a discussion of the implications arising from the thesis argument. In descriptive theses, a contrast between the writer's conclusions and the conclusions or arguments of other authors, the main content of research discussion sections or chapters, is usually part of the main body, hence there is no need for a separate discussion section.
The language of argument
Another difference between the styles is the choice of language. Language choice in research often reflects methodology, as discussed in the topic on methods and methodology and results writing in this resource. Since the two styles, informative and descriptive, originally emerge from different discipline methodologies, different research language can often be identified within each. Use of the term 'argument', for instance, is rarely found in science fields which often share an epistemological frame in which it is assumed that observations of 'fact' are both possible and optimal. The term 'argue', on the other hand, which seems to imply some level of contentiousness or uncertainty about the findings, is therefore avoided. In many, perhaps most areas of the social sciences and humanities there is considerable epistemological complexity, and often disagreement, about the methodological assumptions that underpin claims about 'valid' knowledge. Perhaps for this reason, research writers in social science and humanities disciplines have been more comfortable with language like 'argue' or 'argument' in signalling the key thesis or 'proposition' in their work.
An important implication of epistemological differences is that terms like 'argument' or 'argue' carry special significance for discipline readers. In the dictionary, 'argue' means 'to provide evidence to support a case'. But in the descriptive research context, the word argue signals something more precise—'to argue' typically means to provide evidence to support the central case that will be made in the thesis or exegesis. That is to say, when discipline readers see this term 'argue' they typically assume that the writer is signalling the main thesis, either that of the author, or, when used to refer to another author, of another author's text. For this reason, the term 'argues' and phrases like 'this thesis will argue' or 'such and such argues' should be used only when you wish to signal the key idea of your own or of another author's text. Using the phrase 'I will argue' in different parts of your writing to signal different ideas could leave the research reader wondering which of the ideas referred to will be your 'thesis' or key proposition. To avoid confusion, use the language of argument sparingly, or only when signalling your 'thesis' or key proposition or finding.
Thesis structures
From Paltridge, B ‘Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published articles and actual practice’, in English for Specific Purposes.
The 'structure' of research writing, and of theses in particular, is diverse. Structure here refers to the length, the order of content, and the naming of sections or of chapters within the thesis or exegesis. Four basic thesis structures can be identified, outlined below, although there would be blends and further derivations of these. Type one, two and four would be more typical of the informative style, and type three more typical of the descriptive style.
1. Traditional: Simple
- Introduction
- Literature Review
- Materials and Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusions
2. Traditional: Complex
- Introduction
- Review of the literature
- Background theory
- General Methods
- Study 1
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion and conclusion
- Study 2
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion and conclusion
- Study 3 etc
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion and conclusion
- Conclusions
3. Topic-based
- Introduction
- Topic 1
- Topic 2
- Topic 3 etc
- Conclusions
4. Compilation of research articles
- Introduction
- Background to the Study
- Research Article 1
- Introduction
- Literature review
- Materials and methods
- Results
- Discussion and conclusion
- Research article 2
- Introduction
- Literature review
- Materials and methods
- Results
- Discussion and conclusion
- Research article 3 etc
- Introduction
- Literature review
- Materials and methods
- Results
- Discussion and conclusion
- Discussion and Conclusions
Thesis chapter structure examples
Before moving on to consider how the story line is condensed within an introduction in the next topic, it may be useful to see some examples of how the overall research story progresses within the chapter structure of different types of thesis. Both the introduction and the abstract provide the core information from each step in the story line that frames the thesis.
In the text boxes below, the key information from each step in the research story line has been extracted from theses with different methodolologies, styles, and stuctures, and from different disciplines. Each text box reads like an introduction or an extended abstract, but headings have been added to show where the content appears in the thesis, which also shows what proportion of the overall content is dedicated to each step. Although each example is unique, the examples show that the same steps appear in the same order in each, but that there are significant differences in where the steps are written about, or in the length attributed to each. For instance, some discuss methodology in a few paragraphs within the introductory chapter, others devote several chapters to methodology. In some theses, the majority of content is devoted to reporting and discussing results or to developing the evidence to support the argument. Others have only one results chapter.
Journal article structure examples
Although much shorter in length, journal articles contain the same research story line steps as research theses and exegeses. Three summaries of the research story line of journal papers are provided below to exemplify this.
Informative, marketing
Larson, JS., Bradlow, ET. and Fader, PS. (2005), 'An exploratory look at supermarket shopping paths', International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22:395-414.
Statement of the problem (first paragraph introduction)
Most marketers have a well-established schema for shopper travel behaviour within a supermarket—the typical customer is assumed to travel up and down the aisles of the store, stopping at various category locations, deliberating about their consideration set, choosing the best (utility maximising) option, and then continuing in a similar manner until the path is complete. Despite the common presumption of this scenario, little research has been undertaken to understand actual travel patterns within a supermarket. How do shoppers really travel through the store? Do they go through every aisle, or do they skip from one area to another in a more direct manner? Do they spend much of their time moving around the outer ring of the store (aka the 'racetrack'), or do they spend most of their time in certain store sections?
Literature review and aim or objective (separate paragraph introduction)
The goal of this research is to undertake exploratory analyses, useful for data summarization, inference, and intuition about shopper travel path data. Specifically, we want to identify typical in-store supermarket travel behaviours that will help us understand how shoppers move through a supermarket. Similar research ideas, summarizing large sets of 'behavioural' curves have been explored using principle components analysis methods (Bradlow, 2002; Jones and Rice, 1992); however, our goal here is not to explain the maximal variation across customers with principle curves, but instead to cluster respondents into 'types' of shoppers and describe the prototypical path of a general cluster.
Method and methodology (separate paragraph introduction)
A rich new data source now allows us to examine behavioural questions. Sorensen Associates affixed RFID (radio frequency identification) tags to the bottom of every grocery cart in an actual supermarket in the western US. These tags emit a signal every 5 seconds that is received by receptors installed at various locations throughout the store. The arrival latencies of the signals at the receptor locations are used to triangulate the position of the grocery cart.
Results/evidence (introduction of main body)
For shopping trips under 10min, there exist two distinguishing patterns. Most shoppers choose the 'default' start path along the racetrack to the right of the office storage area between the aisles and the produce. A significant proportion of short paths breaks the default pattern. ... We will see from the results of the longer groups that shoppers not faced with such self-imposed time constraints are more likely to follow the default path up the right hand side of the store. ...
Discussion/Conclusion (last paragraph)
There is an extremely low occurrence of the pattern commonly thought to dominate store travel - weaving up and down all aisles. Most shoppers tend only to travel select aisles, and rarely in the systematic up and down pattern most tend to consider the dominant travel pattern. ... Whereas previous folklore perpetuated the myth that the perimeter of the store was visited incidental to successive aisle traverses, we now know that it often serves as the main thoroughfare, effectively a 'home base' from which shoppers take quick trips into the aisles. ... This simple observation has important implications for the placement of key products, the use of end-cap displays, etc. Products placed at the center of aisles will receive much less 'face time' than those placed toward the ends. Of related interest is a practitioner study that found that placing familiar brands at the end of the aisles served as a 'welcome mat' to those aisles, effectively increasing traffic (Sorensen, 2005). ... A study of the linkage between travel and purchase behaviour seems a logical next step. Linking specific travel patterns to individual purchase decisions may lead to an improved understanding of consumer motivations for purchasing certain items, and can shed light on the complementarity and substitutability of goods in ways that more traditional 'market basket' analysis cannot capture.
Descriptive, education
Paton, M 'Is critical analysis foreign to Chinese students?' In Communication skills in university education, Emmanuel Manalo and Glenis Wong-Toi (eds), pp. 1-10.
Statement of the problem (introduction)
In a workshop presented at the 7th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference, Kutieleh and Egege (2003) argued that critical thinking is specifically a Western approach to knowledge claims and that the challenge for transition programmes for international Asian students is the incorporation of critical thinking into first-year programmes without taking either an assimilationist or a deficit approach. This follows the arguments of those such as Atkinson (1997) and Fox (1994) that critical thinking is incompatible with Asian cultural attitudes.
Statement of the argument (introduction)
I argue, in contrast, from the perspective of history of science in China, that critical thinking is not the preserve of Western culture and that the comparative lack of "critical" quality in the academic work of East Asian international students in English is due to the difficulties of study in the context of edge-of-knowledge discourse in a second, third or fourth language. Regardless of their cultural background, the majority of typical first-year students need to be inculcated into critical thinking because from the perspective of developmental psychology, even though such students are generally near their peak of fluid intelligence, other cognitive abilities related to critical thinking, such as integrative thinking and reflective judgment are less evident at their stage of development.
Method and methodology (introduction)
The paper draws on critical literature to demonstrate the critical tradition of China and Chinese learners, and outlines various teaching and learning strategies developed to assist the development of critical analysis for students new to academic writing.
Results/evidence (introduction main body)
A cursory glance at the various volumes that make up Needham's Science and civilisation in China (1959, 1962) would indicate that elements of scientific thinking have been a major source of the success of Chinese culture over the millennia (developed in the first part of main body).
Lifespan developmental psychology suggests that it is not only Chinese students but all undergraduate students in their early years of academic study who need to be inculcated into critical thinking and the discourse that this involves in English (developed in the second part of the main body).
If students understand that critical analysis is the basis of academic argument, they then understand through this exercise the macro-structural form that their writing should take if it is not to fall into a mere summary of others' ideas. Exercises that prove useful in examining the structure and nature of academic argument include ... (final part of the main body)
Discussion/Conclusion (last paragraph)
To conclude, if one considers the history of science in China, it would be almost culturally chauvinistic to suggest that critical thinking is specific to Western culture. I argue that critical thinking is evident in all cultures in that it is through such thinking that humanity survives. However, critical thinking as the basis of knowledge as seen in the university context is not necessarily easily come by, especially with young adult students who have a tendency to see knowledge as a fixed commodity to be ingested and then spat out in examinations. This, of course, is exacerbated by the plethora of examples of the lack of critical thinking exhibited by those in power in society outside (and sometimes inside) the academy. This lack of critical thinking reinforces any reticence on the student's part to be critical, whether it be because of second language difficulties or stage of cognitive development. Thus, if we as academics are to keep the academy as an institution for adding to the knowledge of society through critical thinking, we should not only model the discourse of critical thinking but also inform students as to the reasons for such a discourse.
Informative, human resource management
Greenberg, D., Ladge, J. and Clair, J.(2009) 'Negotiating pregnancy at work: Public and private conflicts' Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 42-56.
Statement of the problem (introduction)
Modern organisations offer an increasing number of family-friendly policies intended to support employees needs (cf. Kossek & Ozeki, 1998; Osterman, 1995). Even though these policies are well-intended, most organizations are still tightly wedded to the traditional ideal worker model, which assumes organizational members commit the majority of their physical and psychological time to their work. This steadfast tradition of the ideal worker has meant that, in today's organisations, well-intended policies rarely provide support for work-life balance and caretaking because of the stigma associated with those who take advantage of them (Kelly & Kalev, 2006). While there are many points in working women's careers when they may be challenged to assimilate into the ideal worker norm, this experience is particularly pronounced when a woman is pregnant. During pregnancy, the maternal body and its suggestions of pregnancy, babies, and breast milk sets mothers apart from the norms of the ideal worker as these norms are grounded in masculine assumptions about work (Gartrell, 2007; Williams, 2000). The inherent contradiction pregnant women face between performing as an ideal worker and an ideal mother is likely to give rise to a wide range of personal and interpersonal conflicts that a pregnant woman will have to negotiate while at work.
Literature review and objective (introduction)
While some research has been done on the negotiations pregnant women face (e.e., Buzzanell & Liu, 2007; Liu & Buzzanell, 2004; Miller, Jablin, Casey, Lamphear-Van Horn, & Ethington, 1996), existing research has primarily focused on the negotiations related to maternity leave. Yet, we would expect that the conflicts pregnant women face in the workplace are likely to extend far beyond maternity leave. In this study we move beyond existing research to investigate the range of intrapersonal and interpersonal conflicts pregnant women negotiate during their pregnancy at work.
Method and methodology (introduction)
Through in-depth interviews with 30 professional women who were pregnant for the first time, we classify the varied issues women negotiate during pregnancy as well as explore why these issues arise and how women respond to them.
Results/evidence (first paragraph main body)
We were surprised to uncover that while women felt their professional identity as an ideal worker was being challenged, they also experienced an affirmation of their personal identity as a pregnant woman as they gained access to a network of working parents. As a result of these mixed messages, women found themselves negotiating conflicts in two distinct spheres. In the public sphere, women were negotiating with various stakeholders in their organisations. These negotiations involved substantive issues related to pregnancy and role along with intangible issues related to identity, professional image, and public/private boundaries. At the same time, we found pregnant women were dealing with internally charged, private negotiations. These negotiations related to women's identity and self-image rather than substantive pregnancy and work role conflicts.
Discussion/Conclusion (last paragraph)
Managers need to recognise that women are not just engaging in formal negotiations over maternity leave, but also are embroiled in intrapersonal negotiations in which they are striking private bargains with themselves about their future identities. Organisations would benefit from providing women with resources to help them make thoughtful decisions about their professional futures. Organisations must also consider that pregnant women have to negotiate intangible aspects of their pregnancies at work, such as the extent to which their private lives become public during their pregnancy. Organisations might consider expanding discussions on sexual harassment and diversity to include the topic of public/private boundaries, since these shifting boundaries can create a hostile workplace for many employees—not just pregnant women.
References
Metcalf, M 2002, How to critique articles.
Partridge, B ‘Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published articles and actual practice’, in English for Specific Purposes.
This web resource was developed by Wendy Bastalich.