Presentation reflection 2

I had to take an agenda item to the weekly team meeting in my third week of working at PIGG PLC.  I had to talk about the project that I am on.  I am creating a new database for the management information system.  I had given a presentation before and that time I relied on my acting skills.  I did realise that there were considerable differences between then and now, particularly in the situation (it was only fellow students and my tutor before).

I was confident but I did spend quite a bit of time preparing.  Because everyone else here uses Power Point, I felt I had better use it – though I realised that it was not for the best reasons.  I also prepared lots of figures so that I could answer questions.  I thought, at that stage, that any questions would involve requests for data.  When I think back on the preparation that I did, I realise that I was desperately trying to prove that I could make a presentation as well as my colleague, who did the last one.  I wanted to impress everyone.  I had not realised there was so much to learn about presenting, and how much I needed to know about Power Point to use it properly. 

When I set up the presentation in the meeting I tried to be calm but it did not work out.  Early on the Power Point went wrong and I began to panic.  Trying to pretend that I was cool and confident made the situation worse because I did not admit my difficulties and ask for help.  The more I spoke, the more my voice went wobbly.  I realised, from the kinds of questions that the others asked, that they did not understand what I was saying.  They were asking for clarification – not the figures.  I felt worse when Mrs Shaw, my boss, started to answer questions for me.  I felt flustered and even less able to cope.

As a result of this poor presentation, my self esteem is low at work now.  I had thought I was doing all right in the company.  After a few days, I went to see Mrs Shaw and we talked it over.  I still feel that her interventions did not help me.  Interestingly several of my colleagues commented that she always does that.  It was probably her behaviour, more than anything else, that damaged my poise.  Partly through talking over the presentation and the things that went wrong (but not, of course, her interventions), I can see several areas that I could get better.  I need to know more about using Power Point – and to practice with it. 

I recognise, also, that my old acting skills might have given me initial confidence, but I needed more than a clear voice, especially when I lost my way with Power Point.  Relying on a mass of figures was not right either.  It was not figures they wanted.  In retrospect, I could have put the figures on a handout.  I am hoping to have a chance to try with a presentation, practicing with some of the team.

Choose, by selecting the hyperlinked word, which of Hatton and Smith's (1995) criteria best fits this piece of reflective writing?

  1. Descriptive: - no discussion beyond description with no evidence of reflection
  2. Descriptive reflective: - description of events with some evidence of deeper consideration in relatively descriptive language.  No real evidence of alternative viewpoints.
  3. Dialogic reflection: - There is a 'stepping back' from the events and actions which leads to different levels of discussion.  A sense of 'mulling over' events is shown.  Evaluation of judgements and a consideration of possible alternatives for explaining and hypothesising about them is shown.  The reflection is analytical or integrative, linking factors and perspectives.
  4. Critical Reflection: - aware that actions and events may be 'located' within and explicable by multiple perspectives, but are located in and influenced by multiple socio-political contexts.

To return to the examples page, close this window


Last modified: Friday, 23 October 2015, 9:40 AM